Happy (really early) New Year!

I'm heading out of town today for New Year's skiing trip, so I'll toast the occasion now. I hope all of you have a great and safe New Year's Eve and Day. Thanks to everyone again for visiting and commenting on the blog, and I'll see you all (virtually, that is) in 2010!

End of the Year wrap-up/discussion, Part 2

I talked recently about habits and skills that are useful to have in both architecture school and architecture work. It got me thinking about things I've learned in the past almost-ten years since I got out of grad school and started working. Granted, this whole blog is me talking about stuff I've learned and suggestions to pass on to those starting out in architecture, but some of the topics I've discussed this year have really synthesized with my own personal experiences, especially lately. Humorist Garrison Keillor once said, "Intelligence is like four-wheel drive; it just gets you stuck in more remote places." The concept behind Keillor's observation holds true, in a sense, in architectural training. The more I learn and the better I get at my job, the more complicated my personal and professional concerns and issues become.

I've worked with some managers this year who, naturally, have been architects much longer than I have. They have seen things, solved problems, and worked on projects that I have not. I learn a great deal from them on a regular basis. One thing that I have learned this year is that in some ways, I'm just as good at what I do as they are, regardless of how many years we've been licensed. For example, one manager insists on seeing the emails I send out to the project team before I send them. Previously, when I was an intern, I could understand this; he wanted to make sure that I had all the information correct, and he wanted to check that I wasn't being rude or unprofessional. Now that I've been licensed for almost four years, he'll reply to my email with either no changes or with stylistic changes--rearranging dependent clauses in a sentence or changing a few words. All the facts are correct, the information and intent are clear, and the tone is polite and professional...but he just had to put his mark on it.

You may find yourself working for people like this. Perhaps the manager has an even worse degree of this sort of behavior--changes his/her mind frequently, refuses to accept (or fights accepting) new information that can improve a process or project, or they aren't around when you need them and then get mad when you have to wing something or ask another architect in the office. This sort of behavior will drive anyone to self-medicate because it violates the basic principle of respect. How do you expect me to do my job when you're looking over my shoulder like I'm fresh out of college? How am I supposed to know what you want me to do if you're inaccessible when I have a question? How am I supposed to take initiative if my every suggestion on ways to save money and tie are met with an immediate "that won't work"?

My suggestion is first to put down the bottle of codeine (you too, Li'l Wayne) and take a deep breath. Then, remember this:

It is not your job to make your boss happy.

I realize that sounds a bit strange coming from me. After all, I'm sure I've used some form of "make your boss happy" somewhere else on this blog, either implicitly or explicitly. Let me clarify the statement: It is your job to do your job, not please and cater to the whims of another or to ingratiate yourself and be a yes-man (or yes-woman) as if your boss is a petulant five-year-old with semi-automatic weapons. You answer, as it were, to a higher authority: you are accountable to the project, and therefore to the firm. When you make decisions and take actions that are in the service of the job or the project, you are doing your best and operating in the best interest of the project through whatever conduit you have been given (doing product research, checking a plan for code violations, drawing details, etc.).

Your boss (or bosses) may have certain ways that s/he wants things done, and following those procedures keeps conflict to a minimum and helps you learn the ins and outs of a complex profession. However, try not to let the learning process (and the feeling of oh-crap-please-don't-lay-me-off-not-in-this-economy) bully you into not making suggestions, solving problems, and working for the best outcome on your projects. If you must ever answer for your actions, you can do so with conviction and a clean conscience and without ego, spite, or malice, knowing that you have done so in the service of your job and your employer.

Merry Christmas (and Happy Belated Hanukkah)!

I hope all of you are reading this anytime but on Christmas Day itself (unless you're really needing a break from all the relatives). Go! Go have fun and take a break and enjoy some time off during the season. Throw some snowballs at someone if you live in the northeast, and go, um, throw sand at someone if you live in the southwest...or something. I'm taking a little break myself, so have a great holiday season and I'll catch you next week!

End of the Year wrap-up/discussion, Part 1

Though any time is a good time for reflection, few times seem as appropriate as the end of the year to do a little self-survey and to take stock of who, what, and where you are now. Perhaps it's the shortening days, but even energetic little me gets a bit quiet and thoughtful. I've been talking a lot lately with a friend of mine from grad school who is now an architecture school professor. His stories of his students makes us both compare the present crop of future architects with our class almost ten years ago, when we ourselves were the future of the profession. He tells me of their triumphs and missteps, and it makes me recall my own missteps and triumphs.

While school and work for architects is very different, there are qualities and habits that benefit you in both settings, and there are lessons learned that improve your work or your creativity regardless of what major you eventually follow or job you take. A few things I learned in college/architecture school that have helped me to this day:

• Time management. We architects love to brag about how much time we've spent in studio while we're still in school, and sometimes we continue to brag about how much time we've spent at work once we're employed. But I realized back in college that Studio wasn't the only class I was taking; the point of school is to get an education, not just to build pretty models. And once you're out in the work world, life is for living, not just for making pages and pages of flashing details and figuring out juuuuust the right angle for your building's entrance canopy. Get some sleep, go for a run, and have some fun, then come back to work and make the most out of the 8-9 hours a day that you spend there. Get your work done (and do it right) so that you don't have to spend your entire weekend futzing around with the entry canopy.
• Good, clear communication skills. Good writing skills allowed me to do well on papers and essays, which got me good grades in school. Today, my now-excellent writing skills allow me to write good, clear emails and letters used to explain something, convey requirements for a deadline, or convince others of the rightness for a course of action. Good verbal communication involves many of the same skills, the biggest of which is remembering not to use archispeak and instead to explain things and ask questions that are easily understood by non-architects. Also, learning how to frame requests in the service of the Studio project/job/construction project goes a lot farther than "just do it my way cuz it looks the best."
• A sense of humor. Nothing loosens up a group of people or a tense project team like a good laugh, and being able to laugh with your team can provide the camaraderie that you used to have with your fellow Studio/classmates. Laughter bonds people, and that's really helpful when you're trying to keep everyone energized, focused, and civil with each other.

So what about you? What did you learn in architecture school/college that has really contributed to your success in the work world? Share in the comments, or feel free to email me in the sidebar.

There will be more next week on this topic, but do let me know if you have a topic you'd like to see discussed here, or if you have a question for Intern 101. Thanks!

The Literate Architect, Part 2 of 2

Recently, I discussed here a few words that get used incorrectly in common spoken and written forms, according to my teacher and professor relatives. It could be argued that architects don’t really need to be that fantastic of spellers, writers, or linguists—after all, we’re being paid to design buildings, not write research papers, right? Well…

Architects get a lot of schooling and training to do what they do, and then they turn around and charge people upwards of $100/hour to design buildings that work for the clients now and in the future and pass building codes and accessibility codes and will stand up and not leak water and will be warm in the winter and cool in the summer and so on…shouldn’t the person who does all these things be coherent and literate as well? It’s not actually that much to ask that a person with five to six years of college be able to use the word “their” correctly and form a clear, concise email explaining to the owner why they need more money to continue working on their project. Cheezburgr language only gets you somewhere if you’re actually a cat.

So the first rule of good writing and spelling is to remember that Spell Check is not your friend, just an acquaintance. One of my English professor relatives has commented to me that she frequently starts letters with “Dear family and friends,” but her fast-typing hands will put down “Dear family and fiends” instead. Both “friends” and “fiends” are words in the English language, but they mean very different things as a salutation in a letter. Because this kind of mistake is easy to make, having someone glance over important emails and letters before they go out is important. That same English professor relative of mine calls this the “looking for your keys” phenomenon. At some point, you’ve likely turned the living room upside down looking for your keys for twenty minutes with no luck, only to have someone walk into the room and immediately lay hands on them where they hid in plain view. So having someone look at a written document you’ve been staring at for a while is handy, as they’ll catch obvious mistakes that are staring you in the face.

The “family/fiends” accident brings up a discussion of nuance in language. The words you choose to say and especially to write in the workplace have an effect and convey particular meanings, so select those words with care. The intent is always to be polite but direct, civil and clear. Let’s use an example of emailing all of your consultants that you need their specs on Thursday to put into the spec book for CDs. The obvious thing is to email everyone with a simple line: “Send me your spec sections on Thursday. Thanks.” Fair enough, but think about what you’ve left out.
What format did you want the specs in (Word, WordPerfect, Works, PDF)? Oh, Word? Okay, so now it’s “Send me your spec sections in Word on Thursday.”

Oh, but specs have a header and footer on them, and what should they say? Now it’s “Send me your spec sections in Word format on Thursday with the headers and footers we sent you last week, using Friday’s date as date of issuance.”

Better, but were you wanting to get them to the printer’s office on Thursday? And they have to be there by 4pm so he can print them by Friday, so you’ll need all the specs together a couple of hours before that to be safe. So now were at “Send me your spec sections in Word format by 2pm on Thursday with the headers and footers we sent you last week, using Friday’s date as date of issuance.”

Nice! But we’re still missing something. Can you guess what it is?

How about “please”?

It may seem a bit silly to use a word like “please” when you’re just asking people to do the job you’re paying them to do. But two things are at work here: the importance of nuance in language, and the lack of tone of voice in a written format. “Send me your specs” and “please send me your specs” have a slightly different tone, even though they convey the same information. You can call someone and say aloud the first phrase with a kind and friendly (but not fiendish!) tone, but this isn’t spoken language: it’s written.

So now, let’s take our sentence and break it into two sentences to give people a little break while they read: “Please send me your spec sections by 2pm on Thursday. Please use the headers and footers we sent out last week, using Friday’s date as the date of issuance.” Very nice and professional.

The reason that emoticons and abbreviations (LOL, ROTFL, etc.) were invented for the internet is because people needed a way to convey that tone and emotion in an informal written format. People can now write under a picture on a website, “how many clowns did for your dress, Margo?” and pop in the winking face and a “JK” afterwards so Margo knows that they’re kidding. But using humor in a written format that relies on tone of voice and nonverbal communication (gestures, expressions, etc.) is asking for trouble. If one person has a bad day or is already annoyed at getting an email from you may see that joke as a dig at them, or at the very least, you’re just being rude. Save that kind of humor for a phone call instead. (Note: many of my consultants have enjoyed working with me because of my snarky sense of humor, but I have to tone it down in emails. I frequently find myself backspacing and deleting a few lines in each email because I realize that the tone of the joke could be taken as an insult. Instead, I send out the email with just the facts, and then I tell the consultant(s) the joke when I call later. I get better results that way.)

Next time, we’ll dig further into language and how word choice helps or hurts us. In the meantime, if you have a question or comment or topic you’d like to see discussed here, please share it in the comments or email me at the address in the sidebar. Thanks!

The Literate Architect, Part 1 of 2

I’m taking a couple of weeks off from work (nice way to end a busy year), and I’m home visiting family. Many members of my family are teachers and professors, and it’s because of them that I’ve learned the importance of good, clear, correct writing. Good writing includes good grammar and spelling, of course, but it also involves having a solid vocabulary and an understanding of what those words mean. My teacher and professor relatives see spelling errors and incorrect word usage errors on a regular basis, so I thought I’d pass on a few word use and spelling errors that they see on a regular basis, in hopes that you won’t make the same mistakes. Bear in mind that many of these mistakes are not only written but spoken mistakes as well.

Irregardless. Let the record show that this is not even a word. Furthermore, it’s a double negative. “Regardless” means “despite” or “in spite of”, and “ir-“ is a prefix that means not, such as “irregular”. Hence, when you say “irregardless”, what you’re really saying is “regardful.” If you’re going to put out a set of drawings “irregardless” of what the civil engineer is doing, that actually means that you’re putting out that set of drawings with great regard to what the civil engineer has going on.

And whatnot/and stuff/and all that. These are filler words that have little place in clear writing and/or speaking. Be specific, not folksy and casual. Instead of “The civil engineer needs a survey by Thursday so he can do his drawings and whatnot by next Wednesday,” use “The civil engineer needs a survey by Thursday so he can do his drawings by next Wednesday” or “…his drawings and calculations by Wednesday.” According to linguists, a few filler words here and there are acceptable in common speech because we use them to buy us time as we formulate new sentences. A constant stream of filler words in spoken language indicates that we are either talking faster than we think (not a good idea) or that we don’t really know what we’re talking about or don’t have enough information (also not a good idea). Filler words are verboten in writing—you’ve got time to think about and say what you need to say, so filler words aren’t needed unless, again, you’re not thinking about what you write as you write it and reread it.

Homonyms. These are words that are spelled differently and have different meanings but sound the same. Common homonyms in the English language are: your/you’re, hear/here, there/their/they’re, bare/bear, hair/hare, to/too/two, where/wear, stair/stare. The reason I point these out is that Spell Check will not always pick these errors up, yet your sentence suddenly looks odd and makes no sense. Of course, native English speakers can figure out what you mean—even if we don’t know that they’re called “homonyms”, we know what they are. But as native English speakers, there’s no excuse for sending out business emails with the incorrect words used.

Nucular. It’s nuclear: pronounced “noo-KLEE-urr.” It doesn’t matter what your political preference is—just pronounce and spell it correctly, please.

Masonary. This is an error particular to my profession. I hear architects and even contractors and masonry reps use this word, but again it doesn’t exist. It’s not even an adjective, like the “masonary arts.” If you want to refer to something involving bricks and CMU and stone, the word is “masonry”, not “masonary.”

Next time, we’ll talk more about language and why nuance in language is important to architects. In the meantime, if you have a question or comment or topic you’d like to see discussed here, please share it in the comments or email me at the address in the sidebar. Thanks!

Mandatory vacation and having work to do: side note

Some of you may find yourselves in an office where there aren't enough people to do the work. Perhaps you've survived one or more rounds of layoffs and must now pick up where two or even three people have left off. And now it's the end of the year and there's a lot to do and not a lot of time left, and maybe you even find yourself being forced to use the rest of your vacation...but there's still work left to be done. How can you take vacation when you're working all this overtime?

No matter what you decide to do in this situation, don't let your firm eat your vacation (especially if you're paid hourly), and don't work for free. Ever.

As a profession, we architects already don't charge enough for our services, and because we don't have a lot coming in, we don't have a lot to pass on to you, the people that do the work. When you work for free for your firm and give up your time and vacation to work, you've told your firm how much they can pay you to do the job. It's one thing to pitch in and/or take one for the team once in a while. It's another entirely to be told that you have to take vacation and then not be allowed to take it because of work itself.

Furthermore, it's against the ethical code laid out by the AIA that firms do not have volunteer labor. Interns working on billable work for clients as well as anything that contributes to the profitability of the firm must be paid for that time. When I have high school interns working in our office for high school credit, they are not allowed to work on actual projects. (And frankly, I don't want them to--I'm unwilling to trust complete novices with tasks that could cost me money if some high schooler messes them up.) By working for free on billable work, you put your firm in the position of doing something unethical and possibly illegal.

As always, let your manager know that you're having a problem taking your mandated vacation with your workload and ask them how they want you to handle it (again, if you can't take the time off, can you get it in cash?). If they make it absolutely clear that they want you to give up your owed vacation to do the work, you are completely within your rights to refuse, though it's up to you if you want to do so. I realize that with a few real jerks in charge, you may run the risk of being fired during a crappy job market. However, if there's an urgent job waiting to be done and s/he fires you on the spot for refusing to work for free, who exactly is going to step right in without any training and finish the job you're doing? At the very least, if you are clearly directed to do something unethical, you'll know that this particular workplace is not where you want to be for the long haul--get your resume ready for the moment the economy improves and you can take off like Usain Bolt.

Never, ever, ever work for free, and never vacation for free. Take your vacation, get it in cash, carry it over, whatever.

Note: I'm an architect, not a lawyer, so you may want to do some research on your rights as an employee and on vacation time in your state. And remember, if you'd like to discuss a topic or ask a question here on Intern 101, please let me know in the comments or drop me a line via email in the sidebar. Thanks!

The strange situation of mandatory vacation

My apologies for the lack of posts lately--I've been up to my ears in deadlines on two projects. Not only is one of the deadlines for CDs, but I have to have things well wrapped up before next week, at which point I will be on mandatory vacation. The firm for which I work informed all of its employees that we all needed to take any unused vacation time by the end of this year, and the vacation time could not be used during an unpaid week between Christmas and New Year's. I had more than eight days' worth of vacation hours to burn, so I'm about to be out of the office for nearly three weeks.

Forced vacation is a strange thing. On the one hand, having time off and getting paid for it is fun. On the other hand, it's hard to take time off when there's still work to do, and frankly who likes to be told when to take vacation? I'll take it when I dang well please! After all, it's mine and I earned it, right? Here's the thing: you're lucky if you have vacation time, but if you do have it, they owe it to you. The first thing to know is that the U.S. in general does not require that employers provide vacation time off for its employees (think about it--how much vacation time did you get when you worked that food service job in high school?), so if you have vacation time, consider yourself lucky. Second, here in my adopted home state of Colorado, if an employer pays its employees vacation time but an employee can't take it, they are still owed it. (This is more of an HR issue--you'll need to research the laws in your own state further.)

Let's pause here for a moment to consider why a company would force you to take vacation. The first reason, especially at major holiday times like right now, is that there's not a lot to do in the office (and in design and construction in general), and they'd rather not try to scrap around to find you something to do. It's just easier on everyone if you take vacation. The second reason for mandatory vacation is that vacation time shows up on a company's balance sheet as a debt or a loss. If a firm goes into the next year (like 2010) with some of its employees not having used all their vacation time, that shows up as a debt that's still owed by the company. If the company needs to apply for a loan or a line of credit in order to keep functioning for a while (until clients pay them, until new work comes in, etc.), then the company's balance sheet needs to show as little debt as possible so that the creditors will loan them some cashola. No one wants to loan money to someone who has a bunch of debt already, right? The third reason is kinda creepy: if someone is laid off and they have unused vacation time accrued, the company owes them cash for that time. If you use it all up and then get laid off, no one owes you any extra cash then. And let's face it: if a company is laying you off, chances are they don't have a lot of money lying around to pay you the extra vacation time either.

If you have your resume, cover letter, and an abbreviated portfolio in good order, and you've saved up a little cash for your just-in-case fund, then the reason for the forced vacation ultimately doesn't matter. In today's economy, chances are it's the second reason that our company is forcing you to take time off. But let's go back to them owing you the time. If you've had deadline after deadline on billable work, and you're not going to be able to be off when they want you to be off, what's an intern to do? Present your case to your boss and ask him/her what to do. They may send you on to a higher-up manager or to HR. If you can't carry the hours over but can't take the time either, ask if you can have your owed vacation time as a cash sum, like a bonus check. It'll still be subject to taxes and retirement plans, but at least you'll be compensated and the books will be clear.

Different mentors for different reasons

Most recently, we talked about the mentor/mentee relationship between firms and interns. Before we delve further into this, an explanation is necessary regarding the official types of mentorship per IDP. There's the IDP supervisor and there's the mentor. These two roles are delineated more clearly in the IDP Guidelines found at NCARB's IDP website, but here's the short version. Your IDP supervisor is someone you work for and who provides you with daily tasks and monitors your professional progress. Meanwhile, your mentor is an advisor, sounding board, coach, reality check, etc. While your mentor must be licensed, s/he doesn't have to work with you and doesn't even have to be in the same state as you (though I imagine it would be more helpful if they were kinda close by).

It's the mentor part that we'll discuss here for now. While the IDP Guidelines indicate that you should decide on frequency of meetings and length of relationship and so on with your mentor, I'm not entirely convinced that that's necessary. Maybe it's the Gen Xer in me that bristles at this, but it feels awfully formal and stuffy to me. One can have a formal mentorship relationship if one wants, but an intern can get just as good of a mentorship experience just by talking to licensed professionals, asking them questions and advice, asking them to lunch or coffee occasionally and bouncing ideas off of them, and generally engaging in a mentor/mentee relationship without ever sitting down formally and agreeing on x, y, and z.

First off, having only one mentor, formal or not, means that you're only getting one person's point of view on the profession, and architecture is too expansive of a profession to only get one person's input. Having more than one mentor means you're benefiting from a larger pool of experience. For example, if you're wondering whether you should leave your present firm and take a chance elsewhere, I wouldn't be the person to ask, as I've only worked at one firm my entire life. However, if you're wondering how to deal with a cranky engineer or passive-aggressive coworker, I'm your gal (when I'm not designing buildings or working on Intern 101, I teach communication classes at an adult ed center). If you had a mentor that you worked with and then another that you don't work with, you can get two points of view on that passive-aggressive coworker's behavior, one or both of which may be valid.

Other than the formality of the mentorship thing, here's what else disturbs me about this process: according to the IDP Guidelines, the IDP supervisor is the one who certifies if all the info and experience you report on your experience report is correct, but the mentor is the one who signs your IDP reports. This makes no sense to me. The IDP supervisor should be the one who signs it because s/he knows what you've acquired experience in and what you've actually accomplished at work. The mentor's role is that of professional counselor; his/her input should enhance your experience, not be the final t-crosser and i-dotter. And because of the fluid nature of this profession, it's quite likely that your IDP supervisor will at times have to act as your mentor and give you suggestions on how to deal with some situation or suggest what you should work on next in your career, and your mentor will have to act as your supervisor and give you input on the best way to tackle a project. I know that the proverb "it takes a village to raise a child" is overused, but it rather fits here: it takes a village to properly mentor an intern. It takes one or more IDP supervisors and mentors and lots of people in general, being available to answer questions and push an intern to get things done and be resourceful and provide feedback and support and sometimes just to listen. So while the IDP Guidelines have one way of setting up the internship development structure, I suggest that you feel free to experiment a bit with the mentorship part and find relationships that work best for you.

How serious is your firm about mentoring? How serious are you?

A recent post about the state of the architectural profession prompted some good comments on how serious our profession is about mentoring its interns. The comments echoed the frustration of the lack of good direction for interns between the end of school and the end of the ARE and the lack of commitment from firms regarding intern mentorship. Even though NCARB and the AIA created IDP back in the 1970s to provide a structure for ensuring that interns learned what they needed in order to become well-rounded and qualified architects, not all firms and managers seemed to have absorbed the real point of it.

For example, I gained most of my Construction Administration hours while working for a manager who had terrible record-keeping skills and poor communication skills. It wasn't until I was into my fourth year as an intern that I truly learned how to put together a set of documents and learn how to run a project, and it wasn't until I was taking the ARE that I really learned how to do CA (hint: if your CDs are well done, CA is way easier). Internship requires quality and quantity of contact with good professionals in order to succeed. So while I met the amount of required hours for CA in IDP while working for my previous manager (quantity), I didn't necessarily get the kind of education and mentorship regarding my job that I needed.

Some firms out there do get it. They understand that mentoring and creating good interns is beneficial to their firm and indeed their profession. They understand that taking time with interns to show them the best way to do something and spending time regularly reviewing their work and just checking in with the intern makes a better employee that ultimately needs little supervision, just as taking the time to take care of your car regularly means it runs much better and more trouble-free for a long time, or taking the time to get regular exercise and eat healthy allows your body to have the occasional big meal and dessert without gaining weight and allows you to bounce back from illness more easily. Investing in interns makes for a healthy firm and profession. The firms that understand this will, by and large, remain with that firm longer and do good work, while the firms that believe "beating will continue until morale improves" will ultimately suffer.

Regardless of how committed your firm is to mentorship and aiding and guiding you along in your job and career, you have to meet them halfway. Just as employees are no longer as committed to companies as they used to be, neither are companies as committed to employees; hence, your best ally and spokesperson at your job--wherever that may be--is you. You will have to advocate, at least from time to time, for yourself and your career. It is not your firm's job to make you an awesome architect; you have to show some initiative and drive, critical thinking skills, and an ability to retain what you learn in order to be successful. Surprisingly, just getting your B.Arch or M.Arch does not show commitment to a firm. Remember, you can get that final diploma with a range of GPAs. To a certain extent, firms help those who help themselves, so you're going to have to show a firm that you're interested in learning as much as you can.

This means that you'll have to let people know that you need IDP credits in x, y, or z and is there an opportunity to get those hours anytime soon? One of the commentators on the aforementioned post described a situation in which s/he was accused by his/her firm of being more interested in getting IDP credits than in his/her productivity. I would find this situation to be amusing if it weren't for the fact that s/he was eventually fired. What, dare I ask, could be more productive than another licensed architect, or at least an intern with plenty of good experience in every aspect of architecture? Again, the firms that see the benefit need no explanation. However, the firms that don't get it (like the commentator's former firm) need to have it explained. When you make a request for this sort of thing, frame it in the service of the job. How does it help the project, the team, or the firm if you do this/research that/put together whatever? Perhaps you need to get some CA hours, and there is a pile of shop drawings and submittals on an architect's desk that need to be done. Offer to go through them and make the easy markups first and then offer to review them with the architect (or with another architect) once you're done. You can frame this by offering to take it off the architect's to-do list and allow them to do more pressing and high-level matters, like prepare for and go to a few meetings and then edit some specs. A phrase I found to be really useful while I was an intern (and even now) is "I know how busy you are; what can I take off your plate to help you out?"

On Thursday, we'll talk about different ways to mentor as well as the difference between an IDP supervisor and a mentor. In the meantime, if you have a question or would like to see a topic discussed here at Intern 101, feel free to post it in the comments or send me an email from the sidebar. Thanks!

No more all-nighters in Studio?

Reader Matt found an online article regarding changes to the requirements of an architectural education, which would include interdisciplinary studies and an easing of the pull-three-all-nighters-in-a-row studio culture. The reasoning, says the article is that architecture as a profession does not necessarily jive with architecture as an education in terms of actual knowledge required and time spent doing one's job.

Everyone, all together: DUH!

I don't mean to be sarcastic. Well, perhaps a little, but it's only because the disconnect between school and work for us is so glaring and so well-known that it's inexcusable. Yes, there are certain concepts and skills you can only teach when you have a real project being built (such as CA), but the culture of architecture school and studio makes that leap even more of a shock. After the labor that was 6 years of school, I found work almost to be a breeze. First of all, if I worked after "studio" was over, I got paid for it. Second of all, "studio" was usually over by 5 or 5:30, and I had no homework. I was thrilled to have the time after so many years to investigate so many interests and hobbies and creative ideas for which I simply, honestly did not have the time in college, which ironically is supposed to be a time of self-discovery and learning.

Of my nearly ten years in this profession, I've only spent a total of about nine or ten months working studio-esque hours (and again, I got paid for it). I got about 4 hours a night (worst case) in undergrad, and I got 6-8 hours a night (worst case) in grad school, and my grades were actually better in grad school. Why? I think it's because I made the best use of my time when I was present in the studio space--I didn't go for a coffee or go out to talk to someone while they had a smoke every half hour, and I didn't goof off nearly as much as many of the "all-nighter" crews did. I came in, made good, solid use of a 7- to 9-hour Saturday at my drafting table, and then I left to go either do homework for another class or do...anything else. Overall, the work world has been rewarding--the skills that made me a B student in Studio have made me an A+ employee...and I'm still employed after five rounds of layoffs at my office. Nowadays, the people in my office who work at work like they're still in Studio rarely have profitable projects; while that time spent is perhaps useful in school, it's a financial drain on a firm, and a firm does have to make money in order to keep folks around.

Have a look at the article and sound off in the comments: which was easier for you, work or school? What were your work and study habits like in school? What's your take on revising the requirements for architectural degrees, including cross-disciplinary courses?

By the way, happy belated Thanksgiving to everyone out there, and thanks for reading!

The AIA: what's the point? Part 2 of 2

We've talked about how the AIA is structured and what each of its components do, but there's more to what the AIA does. Firstly, it provides professional support to its members. There are many more small firms than large firms in the U.S., and the AIA provides a networking and peer-to-peer support group for the members of these smaller operations. In a larger firm, you have plenty of people (generally speaking) to turn to and ask "how are we going to keep the firm afloat during the economic crisis?" or "what's the best way to work in a design-build relationship?" But smaller firms can feel more isolated, so being a member of a larger community helps provide a sounding board as well as a source of research, support, and resources for smaller practitioners. Being able to meet with your peers from different areas of your state or region, from different areas of the profession (architectural law, public work, contractors, developers, other special fields of architecture, and even future clients), and even from different firms can be invaluable, regardless of whether you're licensed.

Membership in the AIA also helps professionals get and stay educated and on top of issues of importance to them. AIA's wide range of committees and groups get together to discuss, debate, and learn about issues ranging from the environment to building codes to professional development and the ARE/IDP process. Joining these committees provides a forum for acting on issues that are important to you as well. If you want to know how to make a difference, joining one of these groups can help you learn more about the topic as well as direct some kind of action (hopefully).

Furthermore, the AIA provides ethics and standards for professional practice. The AIA helps ensure that not just any yokel with a copy of AutoCAD LT can hang out a shingle and slap together some plans and elevations for a building, and it ensures that there are ethical standards for making sure that architects aren't being dishonest or playing both sides of a situation in order to get paid either way. The AIA promotes qualification-based selections of a firm, not cost-based selection. (It was because of this that they were sued a while back for price fixing, but their heart was in the right place.) And it's important to remember that the AIA is a professional organization, not a union. A union is for a job; an organization is for professionals. A pipe fitter or auto worker will do that one job, or one of a narrow range of jobs; an architect can do a much wider range of jobs within their profession and their field (and related fields).

Having said all that, I have to admit that I'm a somewhat reluctant member of the AIA. I get a ton of emails and flyers from them for things I really am unable to participate in because I'm either a) working or b) doing another hobby or vocation that I find really rewarding. Moreover, I find that, for being advocates of my profession, they're not terribly good at serving the newest of our profession. For whatever reason, we're still calling interns "interns" instead of "architect interns" or "AITs" or something else that makes them sound a little more advanced and educated than a high-school kid volunteering to schlep around an office over the summer. If we're going to continue to treat them as nearly disposable, then architects can have their professional organization as long as interns can have a union that keeps them from working for $35,000/year based on a 55-hour week. That's professional slavery in my book (a little over $12/hr for a master's degree). As Matt Arnold has noted, there's a huge foggy chasm between graduating from school and getting licensed, and there's not a lot of good advice and direction in that void. Being an AIA member can give you a place to develop leadership skills, but where's the leadership for a population that is so desperately in need of leadership...and whom the AIA desperately needs? My fear is that the AIA will, at the end of the day, become an organization made up entirely of committees full of fifty-somethings who occasionally throw a few crumbs towards the young'uns. If, as Mr. Arnold has discovered, they don't have good records of the dropout rate for interns, how do they know who is inheriting our profession and guiding our future?

The AIA: what's the point? Part 1 of 2

The American Institute of Architects (AIA) is a not-for-profit professional organization for architects that serves it's members and provides a voice for the profession. That's their story on the website, and it's a good summary of all the activities in which they engage. I've realized in the last year or so that more interns than not aren't members, so i thought I'd at least present for my readers a summary of what the AIA does so that they can make an informed decision about whether or not to join. After all, if you don't talk to your interns about AIA, who will? The following post is compiled from interviews and discussions with long-time AIA members in my community.

The AIA operates at four levels: national, regional, state, and local. Some responsibilities overlap between the levels' chapters, and the levels have certain activities in common. The national AIA monitors federal governmental activities and laws that are being debated so that it can step in to educate and inform congressional members (commonly known as lobbying) on issues that are important to the design and construction industry and especially to architects. The national AIA also produces a fair amount of resources that all architects, members or not, can benefit from, such as contracts and specifications. Masterspec is an AIA creation, as are all those A201, B141, and so on contracts that are typically used by firms when starting or amending a project and its scope. Finally, the national AIA sets a tone and direction for all the other AIA chapters to follow and concentrate on.

The regional chapters are like the national chapter but at a smaller scale. For example, Colorado is in the Western Mountain Region chapter, which includes Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, and Arizona. The regional chapter concentrates and speaks out on issues that are important to our region, such as water rights and BLM land use and so on. Also, the regional chapter can help provide support for states or areas that have sparse populations and need professional support and advice.

Like the national AIA, the state AIA chapters monitor and speak out on state legislative issues that affect architects, and they provide input on licensing laws (remember that every state gets to decide its architectural licensing requirements). They also organize chapters and various components of local AIA opportunities such as education or environment or design and provide statewide networking opportunities for its members. When the state of Colorado's licensing law was up for renewal in 2008, some folks were pushing to relax the licensing requirements. For example, there we some design-builders who wanted to be able to take someone with a two-year drafting degree and allow him/her to be a licensed architect so that the design-builder could cheaply churn out houses. AIA Colorado stepped in and successfully lobbied to keep some requirements on what it takes to be licensed and even further added that licensed architects had to obtain continuing education requirements in order to stay licensed.

Finally, the local chapters, which can be just one city (like Boston, whom I I understand is also the Massachusetts state chapter and a small northeastern regional chapter as well as a local chapter; or like AIA Denver), or it can be made up of a couple of cities, like AIA Colorado North, which is a local chapter for Denver and Boulder as well as Fort Collins and a few other smaller cities in between. These local chapters provide opportunities for continuing education, member networking, and taking action on a specific focus. For example, AIA Denver has really embraced a focus on the environment and has worked towards improving the design and construction industry's impact on the environment and our natural resources and towards educating the public about ways to help the environment. Denver's zoning code is up for review right now, and the local AIA is providing input on ways to make the zoning laws allow for responsible construction and remodeling/renovation without squelching business. Along with AIA Denver, the group of people working on the new zoning laws include the Urban Land Institute, the Homebuilders Association, and the Downtown Denver Partnership, among others.

On Wednesday, we'll talk more about what's the point of having an AIA and how it might be losing its own battle. In the meantime, if you have comments or questions, or if you'd like to see something discussed on Intern 101, feel free to make a comment on this or another post or drop me a line via email in the sidebar. Thanks!

Lulu's Mailbag: Is our profession in trouble?

I received a great email from Matt Arnold, the architect who also runs Stairway to Architecture (a great site--I love his "Dear Boss" letter). At the end of his provocative and interesting email, Matt asked: As I look at the landscape surrounding schools, internship, and practice, I'm very distressed for our profession. I'm wondering what your perspective is.

his email was so interesting that I felt compelled to turn my response into a post. (Matt, I will also email you back personally.) My short answer to your email is this: to me, the glass is half full, but I'm not sure what it's full of just yet.

Matt's website points out that though roughly 7,000 graduates from architecture schools each year, it appears that only about 4,000 are getting licensed each year. That means that we're not replacing the licensed architects that retire, die, or leave the profession to start a new career or maybe just hop in and out of rehab. While I've always known that in the back of my wee little head, I'm especially startled by that fact nowadays. Between the economy being in the tank and the continued hazing that interns endure (but probably not at Matt's firm--the "Dear Boss" letter makes me want to work there, even if he doesn't like headphones), I believe our profession is going to lose some really good people, and that 3,000-person gap will become wider not just in quantity but also in quality.

The quality of interns--and therefore architects--is of utmost concern to me. Project managers and bosses, in general, continue to give interns a "you need to pay your dues" attitude instead of truly integrating them into all levels of the practice, not just the drawing and the occasional site visit to go field measure something. There are managers who believe that because they were hazed they must haze the new kids in the office infuriate me. News flash: we don't have time to relegate an intern to three-plus years of CAD Jockey or Revit Jockey status--s/he needs to understand specs, go to meetings, deal with consultants and clients, help you put together proposals, and so on. The future of your firm and indeed your profession relies on this.

Matt mentions that his research shows that the average length of internship in New York (the state, I presume) is 11 years. There may be several reasons for this, but I'm betting that one of the reasons is that firms who need good staff will pay top dollar in a town that has a high cost of living and lots of competition for the best interns. And oddly enough, those who do this are on my list as well. Yes, we all know that interns (and architects in general, up and down the ranks) are underpaid, but when you pay an intern mad amounts of cash, where is the incentive to take and pass the ARE? So interns spend years not getting licensed, just making money hand over fist, and suddenly they find themselves unemployed in this economy, pushing 40, and unlicensed. You know how that concerns me. My husband has a friend who is a good architect with coveted design skills. He hopped through firms in a major city for most of the 2000s (about one every 12-24 months) until he was making $82,000 a year, unlicensed. Guess who's unemployed now? (And the fact that he still complains about "how poorly architects are paid" makes me want to stick a drafting pencil in his eye, but I'll spare you that rant.)

My hope for the future of architecture as a profession is that we do a few things, primarily:

1. Stop talking, designing, writing, and speaking for other architects and start doing all those things for the public, for average everyday people who use the spaces we make and don't understand what the word "architectonic" means and don't really care. As I've said before, architecture the profession is about everything but you. Remove your ego from what you design.
2. Shift our thinking from an industrial-era workplace to an information-age workplace. Interns are not disposable, replaceable widgets--they're people. Consider the advantages of a ROWE workplace.
3. Bridge the gap between the generations and their skill sets. Managers need to include interns in all facets of running a project and running a firm--sharing that knowledge is the only way to truly gain their respect. Interns need to include managers in how technology is changing the way we produce our work--in many ways for the better. For example, many of today's project managers that worked in CAD back in the day have no idea how Revit works today, and many of their demands on interns are based on how CAD used to work. Revit solves many of the problems we had in CAD, but it also makes a few things more difficult.

That's a short list, but I think it sums up my outlook on the profession so far. What about you? How does the profession look--and feel--to you?

Enough already!: pushing back when the economy (and your job) pushes on you

If you've been working throughout this economy-from-hell for the past 12-24 months, you're likely seeing the effects of the economy's stress on your coworkers. Perhaps you're experiencing it yourself. It often manifests itself as reflexive irritability at little requests and the tiniest criticisms, anxiety about your present workload and tasks and your future job stability, fear elicited by every minor mistake, and even physical symptoms and ailments such as headaches and migraines, stomachaches, heartburn, and even dizzy spells. A bad economy takes its toll on pretty much everyone up and down the food chain in a company, but it can especially wear on the newest folks to the profession. Because interns have only a few years of experience in their profession, they may feel as if they have few or no options if they are laid off or fired. They feel backed into a corner, so they tolerate a lot of demands and allow their project managers to lean extra-heavily on them.

It's completely understandable--and acceptable--to be angry and annoyed and furious and cranky after having to work more for less money for so long. After a while of acquiescing to each and every demand, even the most balanced person will snap. The goal is to open the pressure valve on your stress levels before you engage in a scorched-earth policy with your boss and firm (and possibly your career). The main things to do are 1) help your bosses and coworkers manage their expectations of you, and 2) give yourself a break.

Managing expectations

People often don't realize what they're asking of you when they assign you a task or make a request. By highlighting for them in no uncertain terms what the cost of compliance is, you hold them accountable for either the unreasonableness of the request or for the poor outcome. For example, if your boss has given you three major things to do by Friday, and on Wednesday she walks up with yet another major task, remind her that she's given you this, that, and the other to do by Friday--is this task more important than those? If she pushes back that "they all have to be done by Friday," it's on you to express just how realistic that deadline is. Just saying "okay" and then falling short is a much worse deal than pushing back on her--more than once if you need to--that what she's asking for is not possible. Even if she insists and then walks away in a huff, you've spoken up, and chances are someone else heard you too.

One intern I know of has a boss who constantly tells her that she can't spend a lot of time on certain projects because there's little fee left on them. Then, when he needs her to put together a plan or update a drawing on those projects, he'll redline them and fiddle-fiddle-fiddle with them, causing her to do the very thing he didn't want her to do. She began calling this to his attention: when bringing him the drawing after the second round of redlines and changes, she would tell him how much time she had spent so far on the project ("Okay, Marco, here's the plan with your changes, and I'm at two and a half hours on this so far."). It might seem a little like hardball, but she wanted to make the cost of compliance very clear to someone who is extraordinarily obsessed with the bottom line.

You may not feel like asking for questions and details when someone is in a hurry and acting extra rude to you at when they assign you a task, but it's more important than ever to do when this rude person's request is setting you up for failure. You also may feel nervous turning down a request at a time when you're easily replaceable. My advice: don't. If you know you won't be able to do the job right in the time allotted given the resources you have at hand, then let the person know. Maybe they want you to finish a code study in three days that someone else started a month ago and now they're gone on maternity leave and you've barely cracked the spine on the 2006 IBC. Maybe they need some nice marketing graphics done today and your knowledge of Illustrator is prosaic at best. Whatever the reason, tell them in the service of the job: "It would take me longer to do that than you have, and I wouldn't do the job it deserves with my limited skills. Perhaps so-and-so could help you better? Or I could help you if I had six days instead of three?"

Give yourself a break

Seriously. Give yourself a break. You're living through the worst economy in the past 30 or so years. There are people your parents' ages that haven't seen an economy this bad. No wonder you're feeling blue and anxious. Take a deep breath. Get a massage or spa service at a local spa school (they do just about as well, and they're way cheaper). Get away from your desk to eat your lunch. When my deadlines were extra stressful but I didn't want to go out to eat every day, a few colleagues and I would go eat lunch in a conference room just to get away from the phone and have a good laugh.

Take a mental health day. You heard me--call in well. As long as you're not playing hooky on an important day, like the day before or day of a major deadline, or on a day where your boss has meetings and will very likely need to handy to help out, there's nothing wrong with taking a sick day and sleeping in, going to a coffee shop and reading the paper for an hour, browsing in a bookstore or library, volunteering, even doing some housecleaning and laundry (unless you like that sort of thing, or as long as you do something else fun that day). If you're so angry and anxious that you constantly find yourself snapping at people or barely able to contain your anger or annoyance, then take a day. You may not be physically or visibly sick, but I guarantee that you are not well and need time away. Take an afternoon or a whole day, either way it's good for you.

If you have a question or a topic you'd like to see covered here, let me know in the comments or email me at the address in the sidebar. Thanks!

Is it worth it to get licensed?

I usually encourage people strongly to get licensed as fast as they can, but the economy actually has me reconsidering my position on this slightly. One of my interns mentioned me that he was going to have to put test taking on hold due to lack of funding. After two years without a raise, being at reduced pay and hours for all of 2009 (and having to take unpaid days during December), and the cost of the exams going up to over $200 per test, he just wasn't able to afford the tests right now. There's a good deal of sense in this, really. Having to choose between taking the ARE and making the rent or mortgage is one of those choices that you shouldn't have to make, but if you make it, choose the housing payment.

There should never be a "good" reason to put off taking the ARE, but not having the money is a fairly acceptable one, especially right now. I recently spoke with an intern who had been laid off but just got a new job. I congratulated her and mentioned that now she could afford to take the ARE. Turns out her mother was going to give her the money to take the tests--she couldn't stand the idea of her daughter being so close to getting licensed and then getting thwarted by a financial issue. If you can borrow the money (interest-free, of course, is best) or get a gift from someone to take the tests, then I encourage you to keep going. After all, if you're also working fewer hours, what better time to study?

But there's another reason that I wouldn't throw stones at you for waiting a few months until the cash comes back before starting up on the exams again. If you're already employed, getting licensed can get you a good raise, which sometimes will kick in as soon as you get your license in your hot little hands. I was given a nice raise mid-year after passing all my tests, and then I got another raise at the end of that year, for example. This year, four people in my office got licensed, and they did not get that same benefit of a atta-boy/girl raise for jumping through the Flaming Hoops of the ARE. I felt really bad for them; they'd worked so hard to achieve this goal, and there was no tangible reward at the end of their efforts. That's not to say that personal satisfaction alone isn't a good reason to do something, but it's nice to have other people recognize what a pain in the butt that testing process is. So, I could see holding off on charging through the tests right now, maybe for at least a few months during the holidays. Taking a breather and then trying to time the completion of your tests with an upturn in the economy--while a little risky--could make your success fresh in the minds of those who dole out raises and might score you a little more. Again, it's a risky, but it could be worth it. I personally would keep going with my exams as long as I could afford them financially, but that's also my personality.

Working in the coal mine: how soon is too soon?

I recently got an email from a college freshman asking if this summer (after one year of college) would be too soon to start working in an office. The short answer is no; I've had high school students work at my office (for high school class credit, not for pay), and it gives them great insight into what the architectural work world is like (as it's quite different from the architectural school world). Just don't set your sights too high for this early foray into a firm's environment.

Drawing is a task that takes a great deal of an intern's time, and if you come into a firm with little or no CAD, Revit, Microstation, ArchiCAD, or whatever kind of software experience, they may not be interested in getting you up to speed on it if you're only going to be there for a few months during the summer. However, some firms may indeed put the time in to teach you the software (usually by having you learn from another intern) so that you can help out. More than likely, though, your daily tasks will be varied and random--you'll do some filing of large drawings one day, then take a set of drawings and specs down to the city the next day, then build a model for another couple of days, then stamp a set of drawings for one of the owners to sign the next, and so on. No matter what you're asked to do, just do it well and without rolling your eyes and sighing. Someone wouldn't ask you to do it if it wasn't important. If it's not important, it just won't get done. There is something to learn from every task you do.

Keep in mind that if you're trying to get hours out of the way for IDP, you can't count any hours worked before you've been in school for at least three years. (More specific information on this is available here.) There are also rules on NCARB's website detailing how much you can count--for example, if you work fewer than X number of hours for less than Y number of continuous week, the time may not count. However, all is not lost if you work a summer or Christmas break and can't count it. Experience is experience, and firms pay you for experience more so than your education. And yes, they should pay you. Even if you're only working for $12/hour for the summer after a year in school, get paid. When you work for free for a company that's not a nonprofit, you've shown them just what your going rate is; don't sell yourself short, and don't let anyone else shortchange you. I don't care how bad the economy is, at least make sure you break even working the job.

Managing Up, Part 3 of 3

Part 1 is of this discussion is here; Part 2 is here.

So now you have some grasp on your manager's work style, and you are figuring out how to anticipate needs, which is a form of providing value. To some extent, however, these discussions are taking place with the assumption that your boss will be nice, polite, clear, predictable, and reasonable with your workload and with critiquing your work. What happens if your boss is cranky, forgetful, impatient, demanding, or annoying? In order words, what happens if your boss is human?

First, whenever your boss--or your coworker or the barista at Starbucks or anybody--acts rude or juvenile towards you, don't take the bait. Don't trade nasty barbs, don't look wounded, just don't react at all. The first rule of dealing with other people from here to eternity is to remember that you have no idea what they've dealt with today, this week, this year, or this lifetime. They may be unfairly taking out bad news or a bad day on you. Also, they may just be jerks. Regardless of the reason that someone, especially someone in charge, may act like a jerk, that does not give you license to be a jerk right back at them. Remember: if a monkey flings poo at you and you fling poo back at the monkey, it's generally not the monkey that looks foolish. Take a deep breath and keep in mind that jerks are usually equal opportunity, so their behavior towards you is nothing personal.

But even if your boss isn't a jerk, you still have to take the high road and help them help you, as Jerry Macguire might say. It's part of the Boss' Paradox: they may not remember what you're doing but they know how well you do (or don't) do what you've been given to do. Hence, it becomes imperative that you highlight for your boss the consequences of compliance with his or her requests. If they have asked you to do something that you know will take three days but they want it done in one, you have to bring that gap in reality to their attention, and you may have to repeat yourself.

Boss (Eva): Okay, so, get me these elevations by noon tomorrow.

You: Um, actually, Eva, the elevations haven't even been started yet and there are a lot of them. It's going to take me three days to get them done.

Eva: Ohhhh, not with this software! It'll bust those elevations out in no time!

You: The software's fast, but not that fast. If you're wanting these for user group meetings, that takes adjusting the viewports of the elevations, getting in casework where none has been drawn, and putting in some basic notes, and that's going to take about three days.

Eva: I don't need notes on them, just casework and sinks.

You: Do you want equipment too?

Eva: No, the owner will tell us what goes where in the meetings.

You: Well, that might save a little time--

Eva: Good! Get to it.

You: --but if you're going to want to see these elevation sheets before you take them to the meeting, and you may have some changes, then I'm really going to need three days to make these look good.

Eva: [sighs heavily and glares at you]

You: Are there some that you need more than others? I can do those first and you can review them while I do the rest.

Eva: No! I need them all at the same time...but I should review them first. [sighs heavily]

You: I can only do about the first floor by noon tomorrow. If you'd like, I can print them out and you can review them then. Otherwise, we could pull on someone else to help me get these done, perhaps Ray might have some time?

While protesting to Eva about what she's asking you to do, your tone of voice is calm, medium, and well-modulated. You're not raising your voice, you're not getting super-quiet, and you're not using profanity or insults or a snide tone. You're simply stating the facts and calling her attention to those facts, and you're doing it more than once--you're not letting her push you back just because she's the boss. If you only protest once and let your boss back you down, or if you just say yes immediately, you run the risk of not fully helping your boss understand that what they're asking for is a waste of time, impossible, whatever. Being the boss doesn't make you right, it just means you're in charge. Also, you're adding more value by presenting solutions: are there some elevations that should be done first, can Ray help us with the elevations, and so on. Pushing back on your boss is easier when you can frame it in the service of the job: I want to make these elevations look good and be useful for your meeting, and in order to do that I need three days, or we can get some help to get it done faster.

By calling your boss on his or her requests when they are unreasonable, you ensure that your future work for that boss is timely and of high quality. You make it clear to your boss what you need in order to satisfy the request in such a way that they can use the outcome. You help them help you.

Architect is experiencing physical difficulties; please stand by...

Folks, I can't figure out if I have a cold or the flu or what, but I've been run down for the past couple of days and have been just functional. I'll get part 3 of "Managing Up" on the site by Monday morning, but in the meantime I need to go take some of my own advice and some Advil and go to bed.

Thanks for continuing to check in here at Intern 101, and major thanks for sharing your comments and insights--I appreciate all suggestions and feedback!

Managing Up, Part 2 of 3

(The first part of this conversation is here.)

So after working with a boss for a few weeks, you've figured out their management style and their standard care for most tasks. You're now at the point where you're having to ask questions, follow up on issues, and generally do the work that will make them look good. In order to do this kind of work though, you'll often have to ask questions or get clarification or feedback from others, including the boss. We all know that our managers are busy people--if they weren't they'd do everything themselves--but that doesn't excuse them from providing you with the information you need to get your job done (which makes your boss look good too). Again, find out how your boss likes to be contacted when you first start working for them. Do they prefer phone call, email, or in-person visits? I recommend that you save questions up and ask a few to several at a time so that you minimize interruptions to your manager, but some tasks don't allow for that. And some bosses prefer to answer the question as soon as it arises because it keeps you from going to far down the wrong path on a task.

Regardless of how your boss wants you to ask questions, any boss worth their salt wants to you ask, so whenever you go up to them (or call or email them), don't apologize for bothering them. It's more bothersome for you to go along your merry way all day and screw up your task than to bother them a few times and then do the job right. Ultimately, you're just doing your job, so quit apologizing for doing your job. Get rid of the following phrases:

• "Sorry to bother you, but..."
• "This may be a dumb question, but..."
• "I hate to bug you, but..."
• Or anything along these lines.

Instead, replace them with something a little more useful, like:

• "I have a few questions for you regarding x..."
• "I know you're getting ready for a meeting; when's a good time to go through a few issues that have come up in this codes study?"
• "I feel like I'm going to be peppering you with these questions all day--is there someone else I should ask these of or would you rather handle them?"

A question I did not include above is "Do you have a moment?" or "Are you busy?" Your boss is always busy, so the last question is moot. I had a boss that would always sigh passive-aggressively and say "no" when I asked her the first question, but her response was moot and rude. Moot because I needed a moment of her time to get answers so I could keep moving on my tasks, and rude because she was making me feel guilty for just doing my job. Don't buy it for a second. Answering questions and keeping people busy comes with being in charge, and it's their job to help you with that.

The next level of managing up involves anticipating needs. Anticipating a boss' needs and requests may look like something akin to being psychic, but there's nothing mystical about it. It's about observing and remembering what your boss' standard of care generally is, and it's about making note of the kinds of questions they ask you or the kinds of things they note when they mark something up or say aloud while reviewing something with you. It's about remembering what kind of drawings you've been asked to print in the past as well as thinking about what might be useful in a meeting depending on who's going to be there. Let's say it's Monday, and your boss has a meeting on Thursday. It's your job (as soon as you know about the meeting) to ask what kind it is and who's going to be there. So you hear your boss say "I have a Cascade Falls meeting on Thursday." You ask her:

• What kind of meeting is it? (pricing? user group? permitting and code review board?)
• Who's going to be there? (clients? contractors? consultants? finance people?)
• What drawings would you like? (plans? elevations?)
• When do you need them by?

By asking these questions, you find out that it's a user group meeting with the clients as well as the mechanical and electrical engineers, and she wants 1st through 5th floor plans and exterior elevations by Wednesday at noon because she's going to be out of the office from then until after the Thursday meeting. So you prepare to print these plans and exterior elevations, but you also think, hey, if the engineers are there, we might need the basement plan too, since a lot of their equipment is in the basement, and they might need a site plan as well, since that shows access to the building as well as where the transformer is going and where the sewer pipe comes in. So you get those drawings in good shape, and you have them ready by Tuesday afternoon, at which point your boss can review the drawings once more before and give you time to make any changes on Wednesday morning. That way, she's walking into the meeting with drawings she's familiar with and that pass muster, and she has a little extra info on hand if she needs it in the meeting.

On Friday: how to help your manager help you.